Families claim chemical at Motorola plants caused birth defects
By Anna Marie Kukec | Daily Herald

October 3, 2008
http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=240169

Two families filed a joint lawsuit against Schaumburg-based Motorola Inc., claiming their work exposed them to toxic chemicals that caused birth defects in their children.
 

... etc
 

"NIOSH recommends in general that ethylene glycol ethers be regarded as a potential reproductive hazard in the workplace," said institute spokesman Fred Blosser.
 
My Reply:

"My urine came on darkly & enzymes went thru the roof"

 Too much exposure would cause blood in urine ... & people would also have fatigue ...  Headaches ... Memory Loss...

I would suggest you think about what exactly you were doing when the dark urine showed up

It will most probably show an exposure to BUTYL or 2-butoxyethanol
which I label as the autoimmune causing chemical

It would lead to CFIDS, CFS, FM type symptoms

http://www.valdezlink.com/re/thecfidsview.htm 

The fatigue is the proof that this chemical is the cause of it all

So avoid this chemical
http://www.valdezlink.com/re/butylcauses.htm 

The doctors, per definition do not know what the anemia is; *
Same info has to be looked at in a different way
High white blood cell counts may be an anemia sign, not infection or lymphoma

People are starting to realize that 2-butoxyethanol is harming them:

Exposure at work - 2-butoxyethanol pdf March, 2008 *

KAREN R. BAKER. ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS. DIVISION III.

KAREN BOHANNON. APPELLANT. v. WALMART STORES, INC,

and. CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, INC. APPELLEES. CA07862

Court Rules for Employee in Benefits Case - 2-butoxyethanol harm
Do gulf war vets & Vietnam Vets have an anemia doctors do not find? * *
 
The Proper View of CFIDS, CFS, FM, ME
 
Pandemic Flu
 
I hope 'the kids' won't have to get a flu shot  *


Generally this exposure is a very serious issue,

I think glyconutrients would help
http://www.valdezlink.com/re/willglyobiologyhelp.htm  

Reply #11 posted by Margaret Diann on Wed Oct 22, 2008 5:08 AM

The thing that is sad, is for the companies who are wrongfully sued ... such as Ford because there is asbestos in break linings. Or those who sue innocents for the mesothelioma lung cancer. Not asbestos, not smoking.

The chemical I know best is 2-butoxyethanol or Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether. I suspect it is the BUTYL that is the most harmful component, and yes, it is a teratogen chemical and there are effects to the children born after serious exposure. Military look for something unique to their war period; however, they should look for a chemical that is common also to the general public: 'gulf war syndrome,' harm to Vietnam vets (the other chemical, not AO) ... Civilians with CFS, CFIDS, FM.

If you moved around the plant you would have better changes of avoiding too much exposure vs someone who worked with continuous exposure to this chemical. Until Congress bans this chemical, best protective equipment is air tight goggles & chemical gloves.

If they had too much exposure, they would have noted 'flu symptoms' AT THAT TIME: blood in urine, headaches, memory loss & FATIGUE

http://www.valdezlink.com/re/motorolabirthdefects.htm#too